Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A low down dirty writing update

  • Sep. 29th, 2008 at 8:52 PM
if I were me
I had Excelsior crit "Zebulon Vance." I made some changes; other than rearranging the first bit of the story so it's more obvious what's going on, I'm not sure my changes were great, but nonetheless, it's off to Writers of the Future, because I am still eligible and I may as well not waste my eligibility, neh?

I'm working on a rewrite/revamp of "The Library Seed." New title, new viewpoint character, same conceit, and the good lines remain. It's an issue of perspective, I guess. I hope. Anyway, the story has been through every major market and some minor ones, and I'm not entirely sure I ever did the story justice.

I should probably send out "Baking for the Apocalypse." I don't know how I feel about "Lawncare in the Afterlife" anymore. "The Spring at Spellwinter Inn" is clearly a baby novel, but I don't know when I want to write it. There are noisier novels clomping around on the second floor and being all passive-aggressive. ("Oh, were you sleeping?")

I've still not taken a second stab at a query letter, and I've taken no stabs whatsoever at a synopsis. I realize I'm not supposed to enjoy synopsizing, but I was also expecting sort of a rancid panic over it, and it's just... apathy that I feel. It's gotta get written. Other things want to get writ more. I will write it when I have to. I will probably not enjoy it. I will probably not go crazy, either. The end. Boring synopsis story over.

I finally had a real idea for how to finish up "Breakfast at Antigone's." Nope, I don't know when I'll write it, or if I will. It's a great title. It could be a great story. I think it's not really the kind of story I want to write, though, not anymore. It is a story of the past. I don't know the person that felt it was such an important story to tell anymore.

I think that's it...

Tags:

Comments

[info]redmomoko wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 02:28 am (UTC)
Maybe ask your first readers of the novel to give you a synopsis of what THEY think it's about and then you can shamelessly crib from them.
[info]fairmer wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 02:59 am (UTC)
A nice idea, but that's like seriously cheating. Also, I would cry if anyone made me write a synopsis of the novel I critted for them. CRY. :)
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 01:39 pm (UTC)
I'm counting on my stunning query letter to get prospective agents to see through the horrors of my synopsis to the marvel that is my story.

LOL LOL LOL! no wonder I don't have any takers yet! Just writing that made me laugh.

Good luck with the synopsis. And I do love your title "The Library Seed." Didn't you just have a new story go up online somewhere? Must check your back entries and see; I want to read it....
[info]fairmer wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 08:47 pm (UTC)
Heh, thanks, all the way around. Uhm... I don't think I have a new story up [since "The Girl-Prince"], I don't think, but I did sell one that will hopefully go up soon...
[info]asakiyume wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 08:52 pm (UTC)
I did sell one that will hopefully go up soon.

That's what I'm thinking of: The one in Quantum Kiss.
[info]sartorias wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 02:18 pm (UTC)
Try writing a synopsis that you'd love to read. What kind of first sentence would catch YOUR eye? If a 'marketing' sentence is a total turnoff, don't feel you have to write those...editors might be sick of them too. What would just rivet you?
[info]fairmer wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 08:41 pm (UTC)
This is an interesting idea, though I have to say, with a big ol' wail, "But I don't want to read synopses, ever!"

Thinking about it in familiar terms, such as the back of a book... My biggest problem with the dust jacket of books is that there's too much of the wrong info revealed (often misleading info, too). So, that's not gonna work.

But I'll think on what you said, and see what floats up from the hindbrain.
[info]sartorias wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 09:03 pm (UTC)
I loathe the back-of-book blurble myself, because it's so often a string of marketing phrases that make the books sound like one another. If an editor says they like that, fine, but when I write my synopses, I try to have it in MY voice, not inflatable ad-blabber, and I try to convey the tone of the story.
[info]fairmer wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 08:43 pm (UTC)
Aha! I was thinking query letter when you said synopsis.

Yes. Yes! This is helpful advice.

Here's a further question for you. What if a synopsis read more like a short story? Would that be off-putting, or fantastic? *muses* Maybe I should ask an agent.
[info]sartorias wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2008 09:17 pm (UTC)
Okay, if the story can be told in a short STORY (as opposed to a narrative data dump) then maybe it should be a short story.

The synopsis is a legitimate data dump--it has to be a datadump. But that does not mean it has to be boring, or Madison Avenue gas ("This is the greatest epic since Tolkien, crossed with Troy...a poignant story of love lost and won, mighty classes of armies and of will...." blabbernumbingblabber.

Let's pretend I've written a knockoff of Lord of the Rings. If I was really Doing Serious Epock-making Epic, I might begin,

The familiar world is ending, but only the long-lived Elves know it. Some wonder why their songs are full of sorrow while others, dwelling in the Kingdoms of humanking, see much more dangerous signs.

Cowled and caped black riders on evil horses ride the roads at night, striking stray travelers dead with just a glance. Spies creep among the company in the most homey inns, bearing tales to those with malevolent intent. Kings increase border watches, magicians meet in serious council.

While, in a little underground house, a hobbit named Frodo plans his birthday party. His life seems perfect and peaceful until on the eve of his party, he receives an unwelcome guest.


If I'm going all pomo, I might begin:

Some say that Elves and Wizards are forces of good. Others maintain that good is an entertaining concept. While heedless humans travel about on their well-kept roads, and hobbits squander their resources in consuming six meals a day, gossiping the while, deep underground, tectonic shifts in culture are driving the Orcs to war.

Whose side will Saruman take? We open with this Faustian figure brooding over the remains of his trusted alliance . . .


(You can tell I'm not very good at pomo.)

Or a breezy, romantic fantasy...

Frodo is 33 tomorrow--which in the Shire is coming of age. He's young, he's cute, and many of the local lasses give him and his beautiful house sidelong looks, while the lads admire the curly tufts between his toes. What's a boy gonna do?

Frodo doesn't know it, but his choice is already made. On the way that night is a magic ring that won't grant any wishes, but hoo boy, does it have power! The problem is, the power just brings out the bad guys! Poor Frodo has to get rid of the thing . . .


These are all incredibly stupid, but I tried to dash down a different approach and tone for each.
[info]fairmer wrote:
Oct. 1st, 2008 01:09 pm (UTC)
I get you on the tones/approaches...

Datadump vs. short story... well, yes, I get you. Maybe I'm not really thinking short story. And I do get that it can't really be a short story, because you aren't supposed to keep the secrets in the synopsis that you keep in the text. The Synopsis Knows All, correct?

Thanks for taking the time on this one, Sherwood. I've got some things to think about.
[info]sartorias wrote:
Oct. 1st, 2008 01:18 pm (UTC)
Yes--synopsis holds all--you want to convince them that your plot is clever, as well as characters and writing.

In fact, if you've got a really clever plot worked out, or a nifty device, flaunt it right up front.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031